This story is from one character’s perspective. It is all in that pertains thoughts from that person’s perspective. Often we won’t know if everything they think is true or if it is their point of view only. Or they could be lying even to themselves.
In this case the character is female and everything is intended to be her perspective of the facts as she sees them.
This kind of character can be called an Unreliable Narrator, examples would include books narrated by a villain. Other Unreliable Narrators include Doctor Watson, we see his side of the investigation that is his honest view, but it is unreliable and in this examples it is used to later around us with Sherlock’s genius.
They could be a Naive Narrator, usually a childlike innocence, such as Boy in The Stripped Pyjamas.
For me at worst this story might be from Unreliable Narrator of Watson’s type. Everything really is her genuine thoughts.
However I’ve made her unreliable in so far as she does have a thought that holds an error of fact. I’ll add an addendum to let you know what her error is.
I’ve used a female perspective as the story was initially from the perspective of a fictional version of me. But by making the chafer female I added one extra shapeshuft.
Also technically this story fails the Bechdal Test. There are not two named characters who talk to each other and not about “him”. That’s deliberate. There are four female characters and I use no Given Names. One male character without a Given Name. And the main character clearly mentions him or we would never know about him. But she only mentions him to herself.
Anyway. The story Continue reading →